<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>hi, it&#39;s mike</title>
    <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/cobalt/</link>
    <description>Recent content on hi, it&#39;s mike</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026, mike</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/cobalt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Quick review: Cobalt Image for normalizing raw across cameras</title>
      <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2021-12-29-i-think-cobalt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</author>
      <guid>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2021-12-29-i-think-cobalt/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.cobalt-image.com&#34;&gt;Cobalt Image&lt;/a&gt; may have taken away my last excuse for working
on a collection of the last few years&amp;rsquo; work. DNGs I shot with the Q2 and
RAFs from the X-Pro3, X100V, and X-T4 all fit with each other now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I went on a brief &amp;ldquo;use it for everything!&amp;rdquo; over the past day, trying it
out on a little of everything from the past few years. This afternoon I
took a step back and realized I want to preserve a record of what I&amp;rsquo;ve
been up to with my edits as much as my subjects, so I&amp;rsquo;m grateful
Lightroom has a &lt;a href=&#34;https://lightroomkillertips.com/using-versions-in-lightroom-cloud/&#34;&gt;versions&lt;/a&gt; feature: As I pick things for the
collection, I can save a snapshot of my favorite edit up to now, then
make a new proof for a collection using Cobalt.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think <a href="https://www.cobalt-image.com">Cobalt Image</a> may have taken away my last excuse for working
on a collection of the last few years&rsquo; work. DNGs I shot with the Q2 and
RAFs from the X-Pro3, X100V, and X-T4 all fit with each other now.</p>
<p>I went on a brief &ldquo;use it for everything!&rdquo; over the past day, trying it
out on a little of everything from the past few years. This afternoon I
took a step back and realized I want to preserve a record of what I&rsquo;ve
been up to with my edits as much as my subjects, so I&rsquo;m grateful
Lightroom has a <a href="https://lightroomkillertips.com/using-versions-in-lightroom-cloud/">versions</a> feature: As I pick things for the
collection, I can save a snapshot of my favorite edit up to now, then
make a new proof for a collection using Cobalt.</p>
<p>I also sat down with my cameras and got them all into a state of rough
similarity with each other on a &ldquo;walking around&rdquo; preset. It doesn&rsquo;t
matter so much with a RAW workflow, but by being close to what will come
out the other side of a Lightroom session I can pay attention to dynamic
range and exposure choices.</p>
<p>Aside from its value as a normalizer, I really like Cobalt&rsquo;s presets.
When I think about how my use of presets has evolved, there&rsquo;s always
been this tension between natural and treated. I think Cobalt
understands how much work color alone is doing, and does less to lean
into &ldquo;vintage-y.&rdquo; It&rsquo;s the difference between looking through old photo
albums, shot with 35mm consumer stock indifferently processed&ndash;or the
output of a Kodak with a 126 film cartridge processed at the
pharmacy&ndash;and leafing through mint condition National Geographics from
1972.</p>
<p>When I was working on my own presets (and trying to get something that
normalized well across my cameras) I picked one of Adobe&rsquo;s &ldquo;Modern&rdquo;
profiles as a base because I didn&rsquo;t want to make artificial vintage
photos &ndash; I just knew there was something in the reds and cyans of old
film stock I liked, but was not interested in throwing away dynamic
range, sharpness, or definition to get it. Starting from something that
didn&rsquo;t throw anything away, then building up the things I wanted to
stand out, worked better for me.</p>
<p>Cobalt&rsquo;s classic film presets preserve the dynamic range my cameras can
provide while reproducing the color bias. Fujifilm cameras come super
close to what I&rsquo;m after with the Classic Negative film simulation + the
color chrome and blue chrome settings, but miss a little for me because
it turns out I was raised on Kodak.</p>
<p>Somewhat relatedly, I&rsquo;ve been reading <cite><a href="https://www.versobooks.com/books/3875-everything-all-the-time-everywhere">Everything, All the Time,
Everywhere</a></cite> and it&rsquo;s a little interesting to be bouncing
between a political headspace, where I feel impatient with
postmodernism, and an aesthetic headspace, where color scientists are
busy selling back the shade &ldquo;Kodak yellow&rdquo; and Fujifilm&rsquo;s included film
simulations all lean toward the vintage, all of which suits me.</p>
<p><img src="/images/2021/cacc823387.jpg" alt=""></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
