<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>hi, it&#39;s mike</title>
    <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/culture/</link>
    <description>Recent content on hi, it&#39;s mike</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026, mike</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:55:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/culture/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Daily notes for 2023-07-10</title>
      <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2023-07-10-daily-notes/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:55:10 -0700</pubDate><author>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</author>
      <guid>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2023-07-10-daily-notes/</guid>
      <description>Something lost along the way.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="whos-doing-politics">Who&rsquo;s doing politics?</h2>
<p>Politics feel more cultural than political these days. And in the wealthier corners of the world, the culture around educated people involves a sort of pained, fretful play in which we problematize virtually everything. It&rsquo;s not the best hobby, but it&rsquo;s widespread enough that good liberals have decided &ldquo;virtue signaling&rdquo; suffered from right-wing capture but was perhaps <a href="https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2019/11/27/20983814/moral-grandstanding-psychology">in need of a suitable conceptual approximation</a> because &ldquo;<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/07/my-white-friends-trivialise-racism-by-labelling-everything-racist-how-do-i-tell-them-to-stop">forced allyship</a>&rdquo; is a manifestation of it, whatever you want to call it.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve pointed to it in the past, but the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky%E2%80%93Foucault_debate">Chomsky-Foucault debate</a> really does strike me as a bellwether, Chomsky earnestly arguing there&rsquo;s a point A, and a point B, and that the law or state may or may not be relevant to how you affix those points in your ethical charts, but they exist; Foucault averring a veritable Xeno&rsquo;s paradox of morality that has since driven the progressive left into a kind of recursive, somehow-other-directed narcissism that undermines and sometimes destroys the things it most seeks to champion and ally itself with.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve come at this idea through a bunch of different lenses in the past several weeks &mdash; Supreme Court rulings, the billionaire submarine, a friend&rsquo;s tweet about an obtuse NYT column, Twitter, Lemmy, reddit, Bluesky &mdash; some of them written down, some diverted into tangents far away from this, some dying as drafts.</p>
<p>I think <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/29/opinion/college-admissions-affirmative-action.html">this essay</a> brought it closer to a boil:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;Expect more antiracist action plans, more vaporous decolonization, more mandated training, more huckster consultants, more vacuous reports, more administrators whose jobs no one can explain, more sleazy land acknowledgments (&lsquo;Sorry I stole your house!&rsquo;), more performative white self-flagellation, more tokenization of minority faculty members.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Go ahead and place a bet with yourself on the likely cultural/political alignment of the author before clicking through.</p>
<p>We were in the streets, furious, three years ago. I&rsquo;m not entirely sure what happened, exactly, but something went wrong or got lost, and the fingerprints of our conflation of politics and culture are all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
