<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>hi, it&#39;s mike</title>
    <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/instax/</link>
    <description>Recent content on hi, it&#39;s mike</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026, mike</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/instax/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>After 10 minutes with the Fujifilm mini Evo Instax camera</title>
      <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2022-02-03-after-minutes-with/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</author>
      <guid>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2022-02-03-after-minutes-with/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I bought the very first Fujifilm Instax hybrid camera they came out with
a few years ago and I did not get it. I didn&#39;t really quite understand
what the &amp;quot;hybrid&amp;quot; part meant, and the object itself was sort of
joyless: Clunky, blobby, fussy. If I wanted to take images that were not
as good as I could take with a nicer camera, and if all I was doing was
printing images taken with an inferior digital camera, I could have just
used my phone along with the Instax printer I already owned.
{: .dropcap}&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the very first Fujifilm Instax hybrid camera they came out with
a few years ago and I did not get it. I didn't really quite understand
what the &quot;hybrid&quot; part meant, and the object itself was sort of
joyless: Clunky, blobby, fussy. If I wanted to take images that were not
as good as I could take with a nicer camera, and if all I was doing was
printing images taken with an inferior digital camera, I could have just
used my phone along with the Instax printer I already owned.
{: .dropcap}</p>
<p>When their next hybrid camera came along I just avoided it. Didn&rsquo;t care
for the aesthetics (more verve than the original hybrid for sure, but
not my thing), and the hybrid thing still didn&rsquo;t make a ton of sense to
me.</p>
<p>When Fujifilm announced the <a href="https://instax.com/mini_evo/en/">Instax mini Evo</a> I hesitated for a
second, but found the whole riff on the industrial design of their
X-series cameras (which are themselves a riff on a hodgepodge of old
film cameras of varying sorts) charming. So I preordered it, thinking
maybe handling would make the difference and if it didn&rsquo;t, well, B&amp;H
has a return policy.</p>
<p>I waited a few months for it to arrive, waffling back and forth on
whether or not to just cancel the order before it could even ship, but a
few things happened along the way. I had a lot of fun with a weird
little toy lens on a regular camera, and I realized that with Omicron
came a reduction in my wandering radius, which meant photography was
feeling a little stale to me again.</p>
<p>Now that it is here and I&rsquo;ve taken the obligatory first selfie,
recreated another recent image, and captured a brass monkey on a shelf,
I can say a few things about it right away:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>Handling really does make a difference. The faux-analog control
rings are sort of fun and help you bypass menus. I&rsquo;d love an
exposure compensation knob, which does live in a menu, but maybe
next time.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The in-camera effects and simulated &ldquo;lenses&rdquo; can be used to make
interesting images. I&rsquo;m looking forward to the double exposure mode
and see a few other interesting effects I can imagine uses for.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>It feels a little better in the hand than the earlier hybrid sitting
on the shelf. Less blobby and clunky, and it takes up about the same
volume as my Fujifilm X100V. It&rsquo;s still made of plastic, but has a
nubbly faux-leather texture and a nice release button. I&rsquo;m going to
pop a few Peak Design anchor points on it and use it with a thin
strap for walking around.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>It does take fine pictures for being super low resolution. There was
a boom in small-sensor, hyper-portable cameras in the early aughts.
They were shaped like a chunky thumb drive and could hang from a
lanyard. This outperforms those by quite a bit, but evokes a similar
aesthetic. I&rsquo;m looking forward to bright days and contrasty shadows,
and appreciate that there&rsquo;s a crop option, so if the relatively wide
28mm lens is hard to fill, you can just tap a few buttons to fix it
in-camera.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Face detection for autofocus, exposure adjustment, and a macro mode
&hellip; okay!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>You can print to it from a phone or Fujifilm camera, which is pretty
neat.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>It has enough onboard storage to hold a bunch of images, and you can
add a microSD card for more storage (and easier bulk import into a
computer or tablet).</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>The one genuine annoyance I feel toward it (actually Fujifilm, Inc.) is
that you cannot transfer unprinted images to your phone via the
accompanying app. It&rsquo;s not like you can&rsquo;t get at them other ways, but it
adds some resistance to the process that Fujifilm will happily collect
~$0.60 per exposure to remove. I kinda feel like if you&rsquo;re the sort of
person to see the point in an underpowered digital camera printing
Instax film, you&rsquo;re likely to want to fiddle with the image in-app, then
round-trip it back out to the camera for a print. Not holding my breath
they&rsquo;ll &ldquo;fix&rdquo; this in an update, because some MBA somewhere in the
bowels of Fujifilm, Inc. most definitely does not consider this
arrangement &ldquo;broken.&rdquo;</p>
<p>I also wish the battery were removable. You can charge it up via a
micro-USB port, so it&rsquo;s no big thing to have a pocket charger along on a
trip, but it&rsquo;d be better yet to be able to buy a few replacement
batteries and keep them in your pocket. The mini Classic 90 has a
replaceable battery. A built-in battery means the camera itself is on a
planned obsolescence timer it really did not need to be on.</p>
<p>Al and I had a recent conversation after I brought home a film camera
from <a href="https://bluemooncamera.com">Blue Moon</a>. I was a little sheepish about it &ndash; the camera
count is sort of high around here &ndash; and she said &ldquo;you know, what&rsquo;s the
one thing you&rsquo;ve been doing for years, that you always come back to, and
that always brings you joy? I think this is okay.&rdquo;</p>
<p>This one seems like a pretty fun addition to the collection, so I&rsquo;m
happy to apply that principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
