<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>hi, it&#39;s mike</title>
    <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/lenses/</link>
    <description>Recent content on hi, it&#39;s mike</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026, mike</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/lenses/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Some Notes on My Fujifilm Lens Collection</title>
      <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2017-06-10-015208/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</author>
      <guid>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2017-06-10-015208/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I promised an email to a friend about my Fujifilm X-mount lenses, but
figured I might as well blog about them and include a few samples.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior to buying an X-T2, I usually had a general-purpose zoom of some
kind (18-200mm) plus a prime or two (35 or 50mm) .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My couple of years with a Fujifilm X100S got me back in a prime lens
mood, and most days when I&amp;rsquo;m picking something to walk around with, I&amp;rsquo;ll
go with a prime. I have a single zoom, and when I&amp;rsquo;m carrying a bag with
a few lenses in it, it&amp;rsquo;s usually one of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I promised an email to a friend about my Fujifilm X-mount lenses, but
figured I might as well blog about them and include a few samples.</p>
<p>Prior to buying an X-T2, I usually had a general-purpose zoom of some
kind (18-200mm) plus a prime or two (35 or 50mm) .</p>
<p>My couple of years with a Fujifilm X100S got me back in a prime lens
mood, and most days when I&rsquo;m picking something to walk around with, I&rsquo;ll
go with a prime. I have a single zoom, and when I&rsquo;m carrying a bag with
a few lenses in it, it&rsquo;s usually one of them.</p>
<p>When I bought my X-T2, I started collecting lenses in earnest. I think I
might sell a few of these now that I understand them all better, so
there&rsquo;s some overlap in the collection.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m not going to talk a lot about the technical characteristics of these
lenses. To my eyes, they&rsquo;re all pretty sharp and nice. Whether they&rsquo;re
weather resistant matters to me because I live in Portland, and then
it&rsquo;s down to how well my brain works with a given focal length. As a
somewhat shy shooter, I don&rsquo;t start feeling comfortable with walking
around lenses until 35mm or so.</p>
<p>If I had to name a favorite out of the bunch &hellip; a desert island lens, I
guess &hellip; I&rsquo;d probably go with the 35mm/f2. It&rsquo;s sharp, weather
resistant, small, and versatile. I&rsquo;ve used it for street, portraits, and
landscapes. It&rsquo;s not as hard to fill as the wider lenses, and the only
thing I&rsquo;ve got that&rsquo;s tighter is the 56mm portrait lens, which isn&rsquo;t
versatile and isn&rsquo;t weather resistant.</p>
<p>I guess I&rsquo;ll do this wide to close.</p>
<h2 id="rokinon-12mmf2">Rokinon 12mm/f2</h2>
<p>I love this lens. It produces really sharp images and it&rsquo;s fairly small
and light. It&rsquo;s a manual focus lens. On the X-T2 I use focus peaking,
which outlines the in-focus parts of the image in red.</p>
<p>My one hangup about this lens is that it&rsquo;s not weather resistant, so it
doesn&rsquo;t come outdoors much during the winter or in rainy weather.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelhall/32645922290/in/album-72157677655534822/" title="Camp 18"><img src="/images/2020/1b94571495.jpg" alt="Camp 18"></a><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<h2 id="fujifilm-16mmf14-wr">Fujifilm 16mm/f1.4 WR</h2>
<p>Kind of love-hate with this lens. It&rsquo;s very fast and sharp, but it sits
in a weird spot for me. Since it&rsquo;s weather resistant I&rsquo;ve carried it
around more readily in the winter than the Rokinon, but it&rsquo;s awfully
close to my 18-135 zoom, or 23mm/f2, which are also weather resistant.</p>
<p><img src="/images/2020/57c5d0ecf6.jpg" alt="Sunset at the Steel Bridge"><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>A quick search tells me I&rsquo;ve put about 900 shots through it, and I can
see where I&rsquo;m still trying to figure it out. It&rsquo;s so close to the
Rokinon on one side, and so close to the 18-135mm zoom on the other that
I&rsquo;m not sure what to do with it. I&rsquo;ve got a few landscape ideas I&rsquo;d like
to try out, but I get the feeling I&rsquo;m going to sell it.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelhall/33765068552/in/album-72157677655534822/" title="DSCF9751.jpg"><img src="/images/2020/ca2452d314.jpg" alt="DSCF9751.jpg"></a><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<h2 id="fujifilm-23mmf2-wr">Fujifilm 23mm/f2 WR</h2>
<p>As a 35mm full-frame equivalent, I suppose this is the classic street
photography focal length. I like that it&rsquo;s small, light, unobtrusive,
and weather resistant. I struggle a little with filling the frame with
it because I&rsquo;m not fond of getting up on subjects. On the other hand,
the 24MP sensor on the X-T2 means I&rsquo;ve got plenty of room to crop.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelhall/33880755356/in/album-72157677655534822/" title="DSCF9893.jpg"><img src="/images/2020/bea10f9f60.jpg" alt="DSCF9893.jpg"></a><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>This is the same focal length as the lense on the X100 series.
Curiously, I&rsquo;m pretty happy with 23mm on those cameras because it&rsquo;s
versatile: Landscapes, environmental portraits, general purpose street
stuff, etc. But when I&rsquo;m shooting with an X100 I&rsquo;m in a different frame
of mind, too: It&rsquo;s a small camera for snapshots. I&rsquo;m in a pretty
informal frame of mind when I&rsquo;m shooting with it. When I have the X-T2
along, I&rsquo;m thinking differently and I&rsquo;m probably carrying a bag with a
few other lenses along.</p>
<h2 id="fujifilm-35mmf2-wr">Fujifilm 35mm/f2 WR</h2>
<p>Next up from the 23mm, another small, weather resistant lens at the
classic 50mm (&ldquo;nifty fifty&rdquo;) full-frame equivalent focal length. I think
this is my favorite walking around lens. It does a little bit of
everything, and I love just carrying it around.</p>
<p><img src="/images/hawthorne-bridge.jpg" alt="Portland Women's March at the Hawthorne Bridge"><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><img src="/images/2020/888221e6ed.jpg" alt="Untitled"><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><img src="/images/2020/ed44a7b1f4.jpg" alt="Untitled"><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><img src="/images/2020/cfc4cc8dc6.jpg" alt="DSCF0726.jpg"><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<h2 id="fujifilm-56mmf12">Fujifilm 56mm/f1.2</h2>
<p>Hm. I bought this for portraits, and I&rsquo;ve used it for portraits. I
haven&rsquo;t taken many portraits. It&rsquo;s fast and sharp. I&rsquo;ve read people who
use it for street photography, but it&rsquo;s a pretty big lens and I&rsquo;m averse
to taking things onto the street that will read as &ldquo;fancy and big, it
must be serious&rdquo; vs. &ldquo;little camera that isn&rsquo;t serious.&rdquo;</p>
<p><img src="/images/2020/55720c8467.jpg" alt="DSCF0243.jpg"><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><img src="/images/2020/b60f109231.jpg" alt="Ben"><script
async="" src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Anyhow, I&rsquo;m glad I&rsquo;ve got it even if it doesn&rsquo;t see a ton of use. It&rsquo;s a
niche lens for a niche purpose. Once I get around to shooting more
people, it&rsquo;ll see more use.</p>
<h2 id="fujifilm-18-135mmf35-56-wr-ois">Fujifilm 18-135mm/f3.5-56 WR OIS</h2>
<p>My sole zoom. I usually have it along when I&rsquo;m carrying more than one
lens, and I like to have it for travel in situations where I don&rsquo;t care
to swap lenses around. Since it&rsquo;s weather resistant, I don&rsquo;t mind taking
it all sorts of places.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelhall/34284684014/in/album-72157684624765276/" title="Untitled"><img src="/images/2020/9da9835126.jpg" alt="Untitled"></a><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Since it&rsquo;s image stabilized, it&rsquo;s good for indoor shooting despite being
relatively slow.</p>
<p><img src="/images/2020/136b9fc5cc.jpg" alt="DSCF7879.jpg"><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelhall/33281495230/in/album-72157681767950456/" title="DSCF9498-4.jpg"><img src="/images/2020/26cb1aeaa1.jpg" alt="DSCF9498-4.jpg"></a><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>The image stabilization is pretty nice. This was shot at pretty high ISO
(6400) and very low shutter speed (1/20):</p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelhall/30725688225/in/datetaken-public/" title="DSCF0917.jpg"><img src="/images/2020/e82d8d4cfb.jpg" alt="DSCF0917.jpg"></a><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Not tack sharp, but pretty usable. When I think back to ISO 1600 on my
old Pentax K100d, which had in-body stabilization, I&rsquo;m pretty happy with
the results.</p>
<p>I thought 135mm would feel like a compromise, because I had a 200mm zoom
for my Nikon D5000. So far, though, I&rsquo;ve been pretty happy. I haven&rsquo;t
felt limited or frustrated, and when I review what I shot with the 200mm
zoom on my Nikon, fewer than a fifth of my shots ever exceeded 135mm.
The majority were shot somewhere between 50mm and 135mm.</p>
<p>I had a 50-200mm zoom for my Pentax K100D, and a lot more of my shots
were taken at 200mm, but that includes a wedding where I used the long
focal length to keep way out of the reception and shoot from the edges.
That was the first time I&rsquo;d ever shot a lot of people, and I was very
uncomfortable with the experience. Since then, I&rsquo;ve loosened up a
little: If I&rsquo;ve been invited to take people pictures, I don&rsquo;t hang back
as much. I also tend to give the subjects a little more room in the
frame for a more environmental portrait sort of effect.</p>
<h2 id="oh-the-lensbabys-sweet-35-sweet-50-edge-50">Oh, the Lensbabys: Sweet 35, Sweet 50, Edge 50</h2>
<p>I bought a Lensbaby Optical Composer plus some lens elements for it.
It&rsquo;s pretty fun to shoot with now and then. They&rsquo;re all manual, and
Lensbaby is a weird shooting experience in general, and it&rsquo;s not weather
resistant, so I don&rsquo;t play with it much anymore. At the same time, it&rsquo;s
a fun creative toy so I&rsquo;m keeping it around.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/gp/michaelhall/4D8t98" title="Lensbaby"><img src="/images/2020/f7d60809cf.jpg" alt="Lensbaby"></a><script async=""
src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js"
charset="utf-8"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
