<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>hi, it&#39;s mike</title>
    <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/tragicomedy/</link>
    <description>Recent content on hi, it&#39;s mike</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026, mike</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mike.puddingtime.org/tags/tragicomedy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Succession Finale Hot Take</title>
      <link>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2023-05-26-succession-finale-hot-take/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>mike@puddingtime.org (mike)</author>
      <guid>https://mike.puddingtime.org/posts/2023-05-26-succession-finale-hot-take/</guid>
      <description>Least hot of all takes, but the Recap People are wrong and someone needs to say it.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The feeds are rife with &ldquo;what will happen?&rdquo; posts from entertainment reporters, and they are all wrong because they are all premised on the idea that something has to &ldquo;happen&rdquo; that offers &ldquo;resolution.&rdquo;</p>
<p>As a functioning tragicomedy, <em>Succession</em> is supposed to do two things:</p>
<ul>
<li>Destroy its heroes, preferably by their own hands.</li>
<li>Restore the circle/community/relationships to whatever the status quo was at the beginning.</li>
</ul>
<p>&ldquo;Destroy&rdquo; can mean a lot of things &ndash; they&rsquo;re all going to go out billionaires no matter what, and I doubt anyone dies or gets blinded &ndash; so let&rsquo;s expand the definition to include things like &ldquo;remain ignorant of and alienated from your own fundamental nature.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Restoration,&rdquo; in a tragicomic context, doesn&rsquo;t have to be a good thing. Formally, all that&rsquo;s required is that the broken circle be repaired.</p>
<p>Premium TV offers two paths out in any finale situation:</p>
<h2 id="model-1-resolution--comedy">Model 1: Resolution (Comedy)</h2>
<p>Comedies are about restoring circles, communities, relationships, families, the self etc.</p>
<p>Examples of comedic resolutions include <em>Breaking Bad</em>, <em>Justified</em>, <em>Mad Men</em>, <em>Lost</em>, and <em>Game of Thrones</em>. This is a wildly uneven collection because half of them were focused on resolving characters and half of them were focused on resolving stories. The first three are <em>good</em> resolutions, the last two are <em>bad</em> resolutions. That&rsquo;s because the first three are comedies at their core, and the latter two didn&rsquo;t really know what they were (well, <em>Lost</em> understood itself to be a shaggy dog story).</p>
<p><em>Breaking Bad</em> wasn&rsquo;t purely tragic: It restored Walt to himself, and it did what it could to restore the core relationship of the series. It might count as a tragicomedy.</p>
<p><em>Justified</em> allows Raylan to defy the song and actually leave Harlan alive.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;">
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/IPhR4c3jwl8" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<p><em>Mad Men</em> restores Don Draper to his essential self &ndash; it doesn&rsquo;t matter that it&rsquo;s to our collective detriment.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;">
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GxtZpFl3pPM" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<h2 id="model-2-life--tragedy">Model 2: Life (Tragedy)</h2>
<p>Tragedies are about the undoing of the protagonist, hero, community, etc.</p>
<p>Examples of tragic resolutions include <em>The Sopranos</em>, <em>The Wire</em>, and <em>Six Feet Under</em>.  This is a less uneven collection, and you&rsquo;re sort of left to stretch definitions. Tony is the tragic figure of <em>The Sopranos</em>, for sure. The entire city of Baltimore &ndash; 21st century America &ndash; is the tragic figure in <em>The Wire</em>.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;">
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3Xpxl_tSYiQ" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<p>We&rsquo;re all the tragic figures in <em>Six Feet Under</em>.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;">
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qD6Y7d4hIW4" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<p>&ldquo;Oh, but <em>Six Feet Under</em> made dying seem sort of normal, so if you&rsquo;re happy-crying it&rsquo;s comedy?&rdquo;</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s a tendentious, very Buddhist reading one could entertain, but no &hellip; overruled.</p>
<p>The only way out for <em>Succession</em> if it is to meet its dramatic obligations is to thwart the children <em>and</em> restore them to the status quo established when we first met them: Alienated, broken humans defined by the swirling voids and directionless appetites at the center of their beings, poisoned and twisted by their father; a kennel of defective greyhounds, and aristocracy&rsquo;s best argument against itself.</p>
<p>Any victories will be Pyrrhic. Any resolutions will be a sop for The Professional Recap people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
